FreePBX vs FusionPBX

Part 1: Overview

1.1. Introduction: Two GUIs, Two Philosophies

In the landscape of open-source Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) solutions, FreePBX and FusionPBX stand as two of the most prominent platforms. Both provide a Graphical User Interface (GUI) to manage complex telephony systems, yet they represent fundamentally different philosophies rooted in their underlying technologies. The choice between them is not merely a preference for one interface over another; it is a strategic decision that impacts performance, scalability, feature access, cost, and administrative approach.

FreePBX is widely recognized as the world’s most popular open-source IP Private Branch Exchange (PBX), a reputation built on its long history and massive user base. It serves as a comprehensive management layer for Asterisk, the venerable open-source communications toolkit. FreePBX’s core philosophy centers on accessibility and extensibility. It aims to simplify the complexities of Asterisk, making it approachable for a broad audience, from small businesses to larger enterprises. Its power is amplified by a vast ecosystem of commercial add-on modules, allowing users to build a tailored Unified Communications (UC) system by purchasing specific functionalities as needed. The “Free” in its name is said to stand for the “Freedom” to build a system tailored to one’s needs.

FusionPBX, in contrast, is a powerful, multi-tenant GUI built upon FreeSWITCH, a highly scalable and robust communications platform. FusionPBX is positioned not just as a PBX, but as a versatile framework capable of serving as a carrier-grade switch, a call center server, a voice application server, and more. Its philosophy prioritizes raw performance, architectural elegance, and native support for demanding, professional deployments. It is engineered from the ground up for multi-tenancy, making it a natural choice for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and businesses that require segregated communication environments on a single hardware instance.

This report will demonstrate that the central distinction between FreePBX and FusionPBX is a direct consequence of the architectural differences between their respective engines, Asterisk and FreeSWITCH. FreePBX offers a feature-rich, community-supported path with a low barrier to entry, monetized through à la carte enhancements. FusionPBX provides a higher-performance, more scalable foundation ideal for service providers, but with a steeper learning curve and a business model that places critical features behind significant subscription paywalls.

1.2. The Core Architectural Divide: FreeSWITCH vs. Asterisk

To make an informed decision between FusionPBX and FreePBX, one must first understand the profound architectural differences between their underlying telephony engines. These differences are not superficial; they are the genesis of each platform’s strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. The choice of GUI is secondary to the choice of engine, as the engine dictates the ultimate capabilities in performance, scalability, and advanced feature implementation.

Architecture

The most fundamental distinction lies in their core design philosophies.

• Asterisk (FreePBX): Operates on a monolithic architecture. In this design, all core components and features are tightly integrated within a single, large application. While this makes Asterisk highly feature-rich and somewhat easier for beginners to comprehend as a single entity, it can lead to significant inefficiencies and performance bottlenecks when handling complex tasks or high call volumes. As more features are added, the interconnected nature of the monolith can create dependencies that hinder stability and scalability.
• FreeSWITCH (FusionPBX): Employs a modular, layered, event-driven architecture. This modern design separates the core switching engine from various functional modules (e.g., codecs, applications, protocols). Administrators and developers can load only the components they need, resulting in a leaner, more efficient, and stable system. This modularity is the key to its superior performance and flexibility, making it exceptionally well-suited for enterprise-grade and high-demand applications.

The selection of a modular architecture for FreeSWITCH over a monolithic one is the pivotal decision that shapes the entire character of FusionPBX. This architectural choice is the direct cause of its superior performance metrics, its inherent ability to handle multi-tenancy securely, its appeal to a more technical market segment, and even the business model of its maintainers. The clean separation of resources in FreeSWITCH is the technical prerequisite for true multi-tenancy, where different customer domains can coexist on one server without interference. This capability makes it highly attractive to service providers and large enterprises, a market that is more technically proficient and has different budget considerations than a typical small business. Consequently, the FusionPBX project can cater to this market with a more complex, powerful interface and a business model that includes high-value subscriptions for advanced features and training, as its target audience prioritizes performance and scalability above ease of use. Conversely, Asterisk’s monolithic design, while simpler for a single-tenant setup, complicates multi-tenancy, positioning FreePBX as the ideal solution for the SMB market and fostering a commercial model based on selling individual feature add-ons.

Performance & Scalability

Performance benchmarks consistently show FreeSWITCH with a significant advantage, particularly under load. A 2024 comparative analysis conducted on identical hardware (Ubuntu 22.04, 8 vCPUs, 16GB RAM) revealed stark differences:

• Concurrent Calls: FreeSWITCH handled over 2,000 concurrent calls, whereas Asterisk’s performance degraded after 1,200 calls.
• Latency: Under high load, FreeSWITCH maintained an average latency of 20ms, while Asterisk’s latency increased to 50ms or more.
• Jitter: FreeSWITCH exhibited lower jitter with an average of 8ms, compared to Asterisk’s 12ms, contributing to better voice quality.

This superior performance makes FusionPBX, powered by FreeSWITCH, the clear choice for carrier-grade services, large-scale call centers, and any environment where high availability and call quality are paramount. Asterisk and FreePBX are better positioned for small to mid-sized businesses (SMBs) where call volumes are more moderate and the absolute peak performance is less critical than the breadth of available features.

Media Handling & Advanced Features

FreeSWITCH was explicitly designed with modern media handling in mind, giving it a distinct advantage in complex applications. It provides superior native support for WebRTC, video conferencing, and high-definition audio/video transcoding. Asterisk offers solid support for standard audio conferencing and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems, but its monolithic design can create performance bottlenecks during media-intensive tasks.

Security

Both platforms provide robust security mechanisms, including Transport Layer Security (TLS) for signaling encryption and Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) for media encryption. However, FreeSWITCH’s modular architecture offers a security advantage. Administrators can disable unused modules and protocols, effectively reducing the system’s attack surface. The same 2024 study found that FreeSWITCH demonstrated stronger resilience against Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, successfully blocking 98% of malicious requests, compared to 85% for Asterisk.

Licensing

The licensing models also reflect their different philosophies:

• Asterisk (FreePBX): Primarily licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), which generally requires derivative works to also be open-sourced. This can be restrictive for businesses wishing to build and sell proprietary solutions based on the platform.
• FreeSWITCH (FusionPBX): Licensed under the more permissive Mozilla Public License (MPL) 1.1. The MPL allows developers to combine FreeSWITCH code with their own proprietary code without requiring them to release their proprietary portions, offering greater flexibility for commercial development.

The following table summarizes the foundational differences between the underlying engines.

Part 2: Head-to-Head Feature & Functionality Comparison

Moving from the engines to the GUIs, the practical implementation of features reveals how the underlying architectural philosophies translate into distinct user experiences and capabilities. The differences are most pronounced in areas critical to service providers and larger businesses.

2.1. Multi-Tenancy: The Defining Feature for Service Providers

Multi-tenancy is arguably the single most significant differentiator between the two platforms and is the primary reason many users migrate from FreePBX to FusionPBX.

• FusionPBX: Was built from the ground up with multi-tenancy as a core design principle, directly leveraging FreeSWITCH’s powerful domain-based architecture. Within a single FusionPBX installation, an administrator can create and manage numerous distinct tenants. Each tenant is completely isolated, with its own set of users, extensions, dialplans, IVRs, music on hold, and configurations. This isolation is not a workaround but an integral part of the system’s structure, as defined in the FreeSWITCH directory and dialplan XML, which can be configured on a per-domain basis. This capability is frequently cited as FusionPBX’s “killer feature,” making it the definitive choice for MSPs, hosted VoIP providers, and organizations that need to serve multiple departments as separate entities from one server.
• FreePBX: Lacks native, built-in multi-tenancy. While Asterisk can be configured for multi-tenant scenarios, it is a complex, manual process. Within the FreePBX ecosystem, the community and expert consensus is that achieving true tenant isolation requires cumbersome workarounds. The most common method is to deploy a separate FreePBX instance for each customer, either on individual Virtual Machines (VMs) or within Docker containers. This approach is functional but inefficient, leading to significantly higher resource consumption (CPU, RAM, storage) and a much greater administrative burden compared to FusionPBX’s elegant, integrated solution.

The presence of native multi-tenancy in FusionPBX is more than just a feature; it is a fundamental business enabler that carves out a distinct market position. This capability is what allows a service provider to build a scalable and profitable hosted PBX business. A provider using FreePBX’s one-VM-per-customer model faces escalating hardware and management costs that make it difficult to compete on price and scale. In contrast, a provider using FusionPBX can host hundreds of tenants on a single, powerful server, drastically reducing operational expenditures and simplifying management. For this specific use case, FusionPBX is not merely an alternative to FreePBX; it is the only economically viable and technically sound choice of the two.

2.2. Call Center and Queue Management

Both platforms provide robust tools for creating and managing call centers, but they differ significantly in how they package and monetize advanced functionality.

• FusionPBX: Offers a comprehensive, built-in call center application as part of its core offering. Administrators can configure queues with a high degree of granularity, defining multiple routing strategies (e.g., Ring All, Round Robin, Longest Idle Agent, Agent with Fewest Calls), setting up agent tiers with specific rules and wait times, and using time-based scoring to prioritize callers. However, the most valuable visualization and reporting tools are locked behind a steep paywall. The real-time Call Center Wallboard and the Call Center Summary (Reporting) application are not available in the free version or lower-tier memberships.
• FreePBX: Provides basic calling queues and Automatic Call Distribution (ACD) functionality for free, which is sufficient for many small businesses. Advanced contact center capabilities are delivered through an extensive catalog of commercial add-on modules sold by Sangoma. These include Queue Reports (Q Xact) for detailed analytics, Queues Pro (VQ Plus) for features like callback and priority routing, Call Recording Reports, and a Queue Wallboard. Recently, Sangoma has also introduced the Sangoma Phone Desktop App, a licensed softphone client that integrates supervisor functions like call monitoring, whispering to agents, and barging into calls.

The divergent monetization strategies for call center features clearly illustrate the core business philosophies of the two projects. FreePBX employs a classic “freemium” model. It lowers the barrier to entry with a functional free product and then allows users to incrementally purchase specific, targeted enhancements as their needs grow. FusionPBX, on the other hand, uses a premium subscription model for its most advanced tools. This “all-or-nothing” approach for features like the wallboard and summary reports is less appealing to smaller companies or those who prefer capital expenditures over high operational costs.

2.3. Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Systems

Both platforms offer powerful and flexible IVR capabilities, allowing businesses to create automated attendants to direct calls. The primary difference lies in the user experience and the level of underlying technical knowledge required.

• FreePBX: The process of creating an IVR in FreePBX is widely considered more intuitive and user-friendly, especially for those without a deep background in telephony. The GUI provides a clear, step-by-step workflow: an administrator first uploads audio prompts via the “System Recordings” module, then navigates to the “IVR” application to create a new menu.
• FusionPBX: The IVR system in FusionPBX is equally, if not more, powerful, but its configuration can be confusing for newcomers. This confusion stems from its tight integration with the underlying FreeSWITCH dialplan logic. An administrator creates an “IVR Menu” in the GUI, defining greetings and options. However, unlike FreePBX, this menu is not an endpoint itself. It is a configuration that is called by a Lua script (ivr_menu.lua). To route a call to it, the administrator must then go to a separate “Destinations” or “Inbound Routes” section and create a rule that transfers the call to the IVR menu’s extension number.

2.4. API and Third-Party Integration

The approach to Application Programming Interface (API) access represents one of the starkest philosophical and economic divides between the two platforms.

• FreePBX: Provides an official API module that is open-source and freely available. This module supports both traditional RESTful API calls and the more modern, flexible GraphQL query language. The open approach encourages a wider ecosystem of integrated applications.
• FusionPBX: Takes a diametrically opposite approach. The official, supported REST API is closed-source and gated behind expensive, high-tier monthly memberships. Access to the API is often tied to the “Purple” ($500/month) or “Gold” ($1000/month) membership levels. This business model effectively makes deep, programmatic integration a premium, high-cost feature.

Part 3: User Experience, Administration, and Ecosystem

Beyond features and performance, the “human factors”—ease of use, administrative workload, and the availability of support—are critical in determining which platform is a better fit for an organization’s operational capabilities.

3.1. Installation, Administration, and User Interface (GUI)

Installation

Both platforms have streamlined their installation processes.

• FusionPBX: Offers well-regarded installation scripts, particularly for Debian, which is the preferred OS of the FreeSWITCH developers. The install is often described as fast, simple, and painless, taking as little as 5-10 minutes and working well on Virtual Private Servers (VPS).
• FreePBX: Provides its own installation script for Debian 12, as well as a pre-configured “FreePBX Distro” in the form of an ISO file.

GUI and Learning Curve

The user interfaces and the learning curves they present are markedly different.

• FreePBX: Is generally considered more user-friendly, with a GUI designed to abstract away the underlying complexities of Asterisk’s configuration files. This makes it more accessible for administrators who are not telephony experts and contributes to its popularity among SMBs.
• FusionPBX: Presents a GUI that is often described as more “technical,” “powerful,” and even “elegant” by experienced users, but it comes with a significantly steeper learning curve. It is explicitly not recommended for individuals who are new to VoIP or networking concepts.

Stability

A recurring theme in user testimonials and forum discussions is the relative stability of the two platforms, particularly concerning updates.

• FreePBX: While Asterisk itself is considered very stable, users frequently report that updates to FreePBX’s commercial and open-source modules can introduce “quirks” or break existing functionality, leading to system instability.
• FusionPBX: Is often praised by its users for its stability once it has been correctly configured.

3.2. Documentation and Community Support

The size and philosophy of the support ecosystems are another major point of divergence.

• FreePBX: Benefits from a massive and highly active global community. This translates into extensive official documentation on the FreePBX Wiki, active user forums, numerous third-party websites, and video tutorials.
• FusionPBX: The support ecosystem is considerably smaller. A frequent and significant criticism leveled against the project is the “abysmal lack of good, free, understandable documentation”. The primary free support channels are the official forums and the Libera.Chat IRC channel (#fusionpbx).

The table below provides a comparative overview of the available support and documentation resources.

Part 4: Business & Economic Considerations

A comprehensive comparison must extend beyond technical features to include a pragmatic analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) and the business philosophies of the corporate stewards behind each project. For any serious business deployment, neither platform is truly “free.”

4.1. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): A Comparative Model

The cost structures for FreePBX and FusionPBX are fundamentally different, reflecting their distinct target markets and monetization strategies.

FreePBX Cost Structure

The core FreePBX software is free to download and use. Costs are incurred through the expansion of functionality:

• Commercial Modules: To add features beyond the basic set, administrators must purchase commercial modules.
• Annual Renewals: After the first 12 months, a “Yearly Upgrade Fee” must be paid to continue receiving software updates and security patches for any purchased commercial modules.
• Paid Support: Sangoma offers optional “Peace of Mind” support packages.

FusionPBX Cost Structure

Like FreePBX, the core FusionPBX software is open-source and free. However, its monetization model is based on high-value subscriptions for access to critical features and support:

• Membership Tiers: Key applications and capabilities are explicitly locked behind monthly membership subscriptions.
• Paid Training: Given the acknowledged scarcity of quality public documentation, paid training courses and seminars are a primary revenue stream.
• Third-Party Add-ons: Essential services for providers, such as billing, are not native to FusionPBX.

The following table models the projected three-year TCO for two common use cases, illustrating the practical financial implications.

Table 4: Sample Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Scenarios (3-Year Projection)

Scenario 1: 20-User SMB with Advanced Call Center Needs

Scenario 2: Startup MSP with 5 Tenants & API Integration Needs

Note: TCO calculations exclude hardware, bandwidth, SIP trunking, and labor costs.

4.2. The Corporate Steward: Sangoma vs. The FusionPBX Project

The nature of the leadership behind each project also has significant implications for its trajectory, stability, and relationship with its community.

• FreePBX/Sangoma: FreePBX is stewarded by Sangoma Technologies, a publicly traded telecommunications company. This provides the project with substantial financial backing, a dedicated development team, and professional marketing and support infrastructure.
• FusionPBX Project: Is primarily driven by its founder and lead developer, Mark Crane, along with a small, dedicated team. This leadership structure provides a clear and consistent vision, with the lead developer describing the project as his “life’s work”.

Part 5: Synthesis, Recommendations, and Final Verdict

The choice between FusionPBX and FreePBX is not a matter of identifying a universally “better” platform. Rather, it is a strategic decision that requires aligning an organization’s specific needs, technical capabilities, and business model with the distinct philosophy and architecture of each system.

5.1. Ideal User Profiles and Use Cases

• Small to Medium Business (Single-Tenant): FreePBX is generally the better choice. The lower initial barrier to entry, the vastly larger community support network, the more accessible documentation, and the ability to purchase specific features à la carte make it a more practical and cost-effective solution.
• MSP / Hosted VoIP Provider: FusionPBX is the superior platform. FusionPBX’s native, scalable multi-tenancy is a decisive and non-negotiable advantage.
• Large Enterprise / High-Volume Call Center: FusionPBX is architecturally superior. In mission-critical environments where performance, stability, and scalability are the highest priorities, FusionPBX’s foundation on FreeSWITCH makes it the stronger technical choice.
• Developer / Integrator: This is a choice with significant trade-offs. The “better” platform depends entirely on the project’s goals and budget.

5.2. Final Verdict: A Decision-Making Framework

Ultimately, there is no single winner. FreePBX is a versatile, accessible, and feature-rich PBX for the masses, while FusionPBX is a high-performance, specialized tool for professionals, service providers, and large-scale deployments. The “better” choice is the one that aligns with the specific profile and priorities of the user.

To arrive at the optimal decision, a prospective user should ask the following questions in order:

1. Is native, scalable multi-tenancy a core, non-negotiable requirement for your business model?
   • Yes: Choose FusionPBX. Its architectural advantage in this area is decisive.
   • No: Proceed to the next question.
2. What is the technical expertise and self-support capability of your team?
   • Beginner to Intermediate: Choose FreePBX. Its gentler learning curve, more intuitive GUI, and vast community support network will provide a much smoother experience.
   • Expert / Professional: Consider FusionPBX. Its power, flexibility, and control will be appreciated by experienced engineers who can navigate its complexities and overcome the documentation gaps.
3. What is your primary performance and scalability requirement?
   • Moderate: Choose FreePBX. For deployments under a few hundred concurrent calls, its performance is more than sufficient.
   • Carrier-Grade / High-Volume: Choose FusionPBX. For thousands of concurrent calls, large-scale conferencing, or media-intensive applications, its FreeSWITCH core is architecturally necessary.
4. What is your business model and budget philosophy for critical features like API access or advanced call center tools?
   • Prefer Capital Expenditures / À La Carte Purchases: Choose FreePBX.
   • Can Absorb High Operational Expenditures / Subscription-Based: Choose FusionPBX.

Works Cited

1. FreePBX vs. FusionPBX Comparison – SourceForge, https://sourceforge.net/software/compare/FreePBX-vs-FusionPBX/
2. FreePBX | Open source, web-based, IP PBX management tool., https://www.freepbx.org/
3. FreePBX – Asterisk, https://www.asterisk.org/asteriskexchange/freepbx/
4. sangoma.com, https://sangoma.com/blog/asterisk-vs-freepbx-whats-the-difference/
5. Asterisk Vs FreePBX: What’s the Difference? – Sangoma Technologies, https://sangoma.com/blog/asterisk-vs-freepbx-whats-the-difference/
6. FreePBX for Beginners: A Guide to Getting Started – Designveloper, https://www.designveloper.com/guide/freepbx-for-beginners/
7. What is FreePBX and why use it for your phone service – Hostinger, https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/what-is-freepbx
8. Welcome to FusionPBX Docs — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/
9. Official FusionPBX – GitHub, https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx
10. Compare Asterisk vs. FusionPBX vs. VitalPBX in 2025 – Slashdot, https://slashdot.org/software/comparison/Asterisk-vs-FusionPBX-vs-VitalPBX/
11. A New Adventure: Introducing FusionPBX… again – Nerd Vittles, https://nerdvittles.com/a-new-adventure-introducing-fusionpbx-again/
12. FusionPBX vs. FreePBX : r/VOIP – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/VOIP/comments/78wyt7/fusionpbx_vs_freepbx/
13. Understanding the Differences between Asterisk and FreeSWITCH …, https://sheerbittech.medium.com/understanding-the-differences-between-asterisk-and-freeswitch-26ece6011c00
14. FreeSWITCH Vs. Asterisk— What Fits Your Business Best in 2025?, https://www.asteriskservice.com/blog/freeswitch-vs-asterisk-what-fits-your-business-best/
15. Asterisk vs FreeSWITCH – Which One To Choose For Business?, https://www.ecosmob.com/asterisk-vs-freeswitch/
16. (PDF) Comparative Analysis of Open-Source VoIP Platforms …, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388518276_Comparative_Analysis_of_Open-Source_VoIP_Platforms_Asterisk_vs_FreeSWITCH
17. FreeSwitch Guide: FreeSwitch vs Asterisk vs PBX – Tragofone, https://tragofone.com/freeswitch-softphone-ultimate-guide-asterisk-pbx-comparison/
18. Asterisk vs. FreeSWITCH: How Are They Different? – DIDforSale, https://www.didforsale.com/asterisk-vs-freeswitch-how-are-they-different
19. Multi-tenant | FreeSWITCH Documentation, https://developer.signalwire.com/freeswitch/FreeSWITCH-Explained/Examples/Multi-tenant_13173521/
20. Best method for Basic FusionPBX API? | Page 2, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/best-method-for-basic-fusionpbx-api.794/page-2
21. Add-Ons | FreePBX – Let Freedom Ring, https://www.freepbx.org/add-ons/
22. Asterisk vs FreeSWITCH – Which One is Best for Your VoIP Solutions?, https://sheerbit.com/asterisk-vs-freeswitch-which-one-is-best-for-your-voip-solutions/
23. FreeSwitch vs Asterisk? : r/VOIP – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/VOIP/comments/3wy9h8/freeswitch_vs_asterisk/
24. All about FreeSWITCH (and how it compares with Asterisk) – TeleDynamics Think Tank, https://info.teledynamics.com/blog/all-about-freeswitch
25. Migrating from FreePBX to FusionPBX : r/VOIP – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/VOIP/comments/12pemr7/migrating_from_freepbx_to_fusionpbx/
26. SIP Trunk Provider for FusionPBX – DIDforSale, https://www.didforsale.com/sip-trunk-provider-for-fusionpbx
27. Best free resources for FusionPBX? : r/VOIP – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/VOIP/comments/1i6zkyl/best_free_resources_for_fusionpbx/
28. Multi-Tenancy Domains/Namespaces – FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/multi-tenancy-domains-namespaces.4116/
29. FreePBX – FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/freepbx-fusionpbx.2679/
30. Replacing FreePBX with FusionPBX – MangoLassi, https://mangolassi.it/topic/14537/replacing-freepbx-with-fusionpbx
31. Applications — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/applications.html
32. Call Centers — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/applications/call_center.html
33. Call Center — documentation de FusionPBX Docs -, https://fusionpbx-docs-pt-br.readthedocs.io/es/latest/applications/call_center.html
34. PBXact Features | FreePBX – Let Freedom Ring, https://www.freepbx.org/pbxact-features/
35. FreePBX vs FreeSWITCH – What’s the Difference? (Pros and Cons), https://cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk/freepbx-vs-freeswitch-whats-the-difference/
36. Contact Center Features – FreePBX, https://www.freepbx.org/wp-content/uploads/PBXact-Contact-Center-features-4.pdf
37. New Advanced Queue Features & Wizards for your Desktop Softphone – FreePBX, https://www.freepbx.org/new-advanced-queue-features-wizards-for-your-desktop-softphone/
38. FreePBX Commercial Modules End User License Agreement – Sangoma, https://sangoma.com/wp-content/uploads/FreePBX-Commercial-Module-EULA-1.pdf
39. FreePBX Add-ons – VoIP Supply, https://www.voipsupply.com/manufacturer/freepbx/freepbx-add-ons
40. IVR Menu — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/applications/ivr.html
41. FreePBX 16 | Add IVR – Voxtelesys, https://voxtelesys.com/tutorial/freepbx-16-add-ivr
42. FreePBX tutorial: Fundamentals of setting up a FreePBX server – Hostinger, https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/freepbx-tutorial
43. How to upload IVR greeting in FreePBX | by Ajit Panday – Medium, https://apanday.medium.com/how-to-upload-ivr-greeting-in-freepbx-8aa3405ae6cd
44. Routing an IVR in FusionPBX – Paul’s Internet Landfill, http://pnijjar.freeshell.org/2015/fusionpbx-ivr/
45. FusionPBX Tutorial – WhichVoIP, https://www.whichvoip.com/articles/fusionpbx-tutorial.htm
46. Module of FreePBX (restapi) :: RESTful API module for your PBX – GitHub, https://github.com/FreePBX-ContributedModules/restapi
47. FreePBX/api – GitHub, https://github.com/FreePBX/api
48. PBX GUI – Sangoma Documentation, https://sangomakb.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PG/pages/24182986/API
49. FreePBX Rest-API Documentation – Development, https://community.freepbx.org/t/freepbx-rest-api-documentation/66553
50. Best method for Basic FusionPBX API?, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/best-method-for-basic-fusionpbx-api.794/
51. Alternatives to FusionPBX? : r/freeswitch – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/freeswitch/comments/rr3m79/alternatives_to_fusionpbx/
52. Users — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/accounts/users.html
53. Testimonials — FusionPBX Docs documentation, https://docs.fusionpbx.com/en/latest/additional_information/testimonials.html
54. Getting Started | FreePBX – Let Freedom Ring, https://www.freepbx.org/get-started/
55. Opinions on FusionPBX : r/VOIP – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/VOIP/comments/4u94sb/opinions_on_fusionpbx/
56. Is anyone using FS PBX? – FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/is-anyone-using-fs-pbx.8049/
57. Thoughts on FreePBX? : r/msp – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/1gmymqy/thoughts_on_freepbx/
58. Training & Support | FreePBX – Let Freedom Ring, https://www.freepbx.org/support/
59. FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/
60. FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/tags/fusionpbx/
61. Sangoma FreePBX Everything Bundle (FPBX-C01Y-EB) (Commercial Module Software), https://www.voipsupply.com/sangoma-freepbx-everything-bundle-fpbx-c01y-eb-commercial-module-software
62. Sangoma FreePBX Advanced Bundle License – 25 Year License (FPBX-C25Y-AB), https://www.thetelecomspot.com/products/sangoma-freepbx-advanced-bundle-license-fpbx-c25y-ab
63. Why is the pricing so annoying? $1375 (over 25 years) for the PBXact ISO over an appliance – FreePBX Community Forums, https://community.freepbx.org/t/why-is-the-pricing-so-annoying-1-375-over-25-years-for-the-pbxact-iso-over-an-appliance/89153
64. Billing for FusionPBX – VoIP-Info, https://www.voip-info.org/billing-for-fusionpbx/
65. Fusion PBX Billing | FusionPBX Forums, https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/fusion-pbx-billing.6142/